Course website for Fall 2010 edition of CSP 19: LGBT Rights in the Era of Obama and Google.
Showing posts with label Kamilla Versi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kamilla Versi. Show all posts
Monday, December 6, 2010
Thursday, October 14, 2010
Gendered Cars?
I read an interesting New York Time’s article for my Sociology 1010 class entitled Your New Baby: A Boy or Girl? (2004) about automakers and how they use gender stereotypes to their advantage when modeling vehicles.
Author, Phil Patton, uses two models of Mercedes-Benz cars as examples to illustrate his point of how concerned automakers are today with fashioning vehicles to appeal differently to the sexes.
The original Mercedes-Benz SLK roadster 1998 had “pert dimensions” and an “insouciant air about it”, however, its four-cylinder engine and automatic transmission “communicated that it would be no threat to the alpha males of the sports car pack.”
Original Mercedes-Benz SLK roadster 1998
7 years later, Mercedes-Benz came out with a newer model, the Mercedes-Benz SLK roadster 2005, which was described as “unabashedly more macho”.
Remodeled Mercedes-Benz SLK roadster 2005
Patton’s description of the car: “A suggestive bulge, culminating in a huge rendition of the Benz three-pointed star, runs down the center of its hood; the jutting details of the front end evoke the Mercedes SLR McLaren supercar that costs roughly 10 times as much.” In advertising the new model, Mercedes worked words like “aggressive” and “muscular” in to the car's description to attract male customers’ attention.
Why did Mercedes remodel the roadster?
“Mercedes says that 52 percent of the registered owners of the first generation SLK’s are women and 48 percent are men; the company would prefer the figures to be more on the order of 60 percent men and 40 percent women.”
Although it would seem that the sex of a particular company’s customers should not matter, this is a standard concern within the industry. It is understood that lots of women will buy a car that appeals to men, but many men, “certainly those to wish to avoid the girlie-men label”, will not buy cars that are associated with women. One possible explanation for women wanting to drive masculine cars suggested by Dr. Malefyt: “A Hummer is masculine, but can appeal to the housewife tired of being ignored.” Whether this is true or not, it still stirs up intrigue regarding why only woman want to transcend the gender binary when it comes to driving cars. Is this because performing masculinity as a gender role is generally regarded as being cool? Or is it simply because it’s thought of as ‘un-cool’ or gay for men to perform femininity? Perhaps because cars in general are understood as being more of a male fascination, women may willingly accept to drive a vehicle catered to men’s taste.
How are people attracted to the cars they buy? A valuable question for marketers is whether a masculine or feminine car will attract the same or opposite sex. “Do people want to drive something that extends or enhances their self, or do they buy cars to have a relationship with them?” Is one’s car meant to be a substitute for a lover or an object to seduce others? The answers to these questions, although seemingly trivial and bizarre, are essential within the car manufacturing industry. This article made me realize that within my own household, my cars are definitely gendered. What about yours?
Thursday, September 30, 2010
Freshman at Rutgers Kills Himself Internet Exposure
This upsetting video clip was forwarded to me by a student in CSP 20. This incident hurts me deeply; the fact that this college freshman, so close to me in age, was compelled to take his own life after being exposed in such a vindictive way by his roommate makes me question whether we are making any progress whatsoever in regard to the gay rights movement. I am truly frightened by the potency of teenage malice.
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/video/tragic-end-online-spying-rutgers-student-tyler-clementi-suicide-11764232?&clipId=11764232&playlistId=11763784&cid=siteplayer
Sunday, September 19, 2010
sex vs gender?
After reading Lorber's The Social Construction of Gender, I began to realize how often I use the terms 'sex' and 'gender' synonymously without ever giving much thought to their true meanings. Sex can roughly be defined as the biological characteristics that define men and women (penis and vagina) whereas gender is neither biological nor physiological. Gender is a social construct, a cultural phenomenon, it is the word we use to describe stereotypes of masculinity and femininity, and most importantly, gender is a performance. As Lorber states, we all do gender, "[it] is one of the major ways that human beings organize their lives" (122). 'Doing gender' is the way we identify ourselves and others within society. We observe all of the rules that pertain to proper masculine or feminine behavior from a very young age and then learn to assimilate to them as we grow up and interact with society. If I see a stranger walking down the street, I am able to quickly lump them into one of two sex categories just from observing their physical characteristics. We can, for the most part, predict anyone's sex without ever having to look at their sexual organs because physical characteristics are gendered characteristics.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)